Douglas Bruce, famous for authoring the TABOR amendment and his cantankerous personality, may be about to meet his Waterloo. In a ruling in Denver on Friday, Administrative Law Judge Robert Spencer ruled that evidence proved Bruce was behind the efforts to get Amendment 60, Amendment 61, and Proposition 101 on the November ballot.Bruce has denied any involvement with supporters of the ballot measures. Petition signers, however, testified that he advised them to delete all correspondence about the efforts. Some of the people working on the issues lived in rental units owned by Bruce during the time that they were obtaining signatures on the petitions to get the initiatives on the ballot.During the month of May, Attorney General John Suthers tried 30 times to serve Bruce with a summons to appear in court. Suthers, who has a long history of dust-ups with Bruce, wanted Bruce to testify about his involvement. Evidently notices were left at Bruce’s door, and subsequently disappeared. Bruce claims that he was out of town at the time. However, Bruce filed a motion in a separate lawsuit against the state of Colorado, which was certified, and which bears a postmark. Dates on both the certification and the postmark on the envelope are during the time he claimed to be gone.Suthers has gone to court to ask a judge to rule that Bruce has been properly served. He needs that ruling in order to file contempt of court charges against Bruce. Suthers plans to file the contempt of court charges next week. If Bruce is found guilty of contempt of court, he could face fines and/or jail. Evidently Bruce is no stranger to jail either--he served eight days in jail in 1995 under similar circumstances. Unfortunately the people who did his dirty work are also now his victims. They were fined $6,000 by Judge Spencer.Homework:Supporters of Evil 3 Amendments FinedAnother Story about the Judge fining Bruce SupportersDouglas Bruce Biography
Yesterday I attended my first League of Women Voters meeting. They are celebrating their 90th birthday this year. Happy Birthday!The purpose of the meeting was to have elected officials serving in Denver report about what is happening in this legislative session and the bills they are sponsoring. NBC 11 News covered the event, but the story they aired about increasing the required renewable energy in Colorado from 20% to 30% missed the real news.Had I been reporting the event, the news headline would have been Penry and King Come to Their Senses. Both of them responded to a question about the three Douglas Bruce sponsored initiatives. Both of them said that they were against the initiatives. I think Penry really does understand that passing these three initiatives would literally shut down Colorado’s government. In fact, he discussed, in the context of another question, promoting a bill to make it more difficult to pass constitutional amendments without them being debated in Colorado’s legislature. He felt that initiatives passed with “no roughing up in the legislature” didn’t result in the best laws for Colorado.Penry is leaving the legislature at the end of this term. King is seeking to replace him. Anyone want to start a pool to guess the date that King runs away from this sensible decision to actively promote the defeat of the three Bruce initiatives? I can’t imagine that the anti-government activists in Grand Junction are going to allow him to maintain this one moment of clarity. Clearly he didn’t understand that FASTER fees are directed toward the repair and upgrade of Colorado’s most dangerous bridges.Homework:http://www.lwvmesa.org/http://www.nbc11news.com/localnews/headlines/84871217.htmlhttp://www.gazette.com/articles/bruce-93113-state-statewide.htmlhttp://facethestate.com/articles/17747-trio-anti-tax-petitions-deck-2010http://www.inside-lane.com/2010/02/03/commentary-faster-would-be-slowed-by-streetcar-funding-diversion/
|