Claudette Konola
 
Paul Krugman wrote an editorial, which is linked here.

Paul Krugman got it right. The oil patch isn’t going to save the American economy—it isn’t a jobs program, but it is a death program for those who live near wildcat operations. I deliberately used the term wildcat—they are small operators who frequently do not have either the will to do the job right or the financial strength to clean up the messes they make. Wildcatters punch holes in the ground, and then move on either flat broke or looking for the next exciting play. They are the entrepreneurs of the oil patch, taking risks, and failing at a rate higher than the more established businessmen.

There are responsible operators, generally the larger ones, who do stick to industry best practices (for the most part.) I’m not saying they are altruistic, just that they don’t usually walk away from a mess at a well site, because they have money in the game that needs to be protected. They do exactly what regulations require, nothing more. So if regulations are weak, even they make messes that taxpayers get to fix.

The only thing that Krugman didn’t mention is that the big money in the industry all goes to executives, politicians, with a few traveling rig masters earning a decent living.  The new rigs are so complicated that their operators move from site to site—no locals need apply. Hence, the jobs in a local market look like they are going up, but the only impact on the local economy is increased accidents caused by heavy equipment going too fast on county roads, which are torn up—with the damages paid for by local taxes.

Local economies often find themselves in boom and bust cycles, where during the optimism of the boom years building trades boom to accommodate the imported workers and their families, and the local tax payer is stuck with the bill when all those buildings sit empty when the inevitable bust comes. Empty buildings turn into blight, as windows become broken, two and four legged critters invade, and graffiti becomes more prominent than the once proud corporate logos fading in the elements.
 
 
My housemate joked that I was working harder now than I was when I got paid for my work. I think he’s looking at the hours that I’m spending either brushing up on issues, or writing in my blog, or meeting with campaign volunteers, or meeting with voters. Some days I’m up by 3:30 a.m. and not calling it a day until after 9:00 p.m.

But it isn’t just me. And I chose this path.

This morning in the Sentinel there was a story about schools facing more budget cuts because of the continuing recession. Part of the solution was to encourage some teachers to take early retirement. Teachers who are left are going to have to work a lot harder.  Because of oil patch workers moving out of the area, enrollment could be down. But losing experienced teachers will place new burdens on those who are left. They won’t see compensation increases keeping pace with the new duties.

The Delta economic development organization asked their executive director to leave. Now the organization’s secretary is single handedly running the day-to-day operations. She’s working harder, without any commensurate pay increases.

That’s the price we pay for living in a boom and bust economy. During boom times we are flush and giddy with new found wealth. During bust times we all have to tighten our belts and work harder just to stay even. We can do better. We need to create a more diverse economy with sustainable growth and jobs.

Homework:

http://www.gjsentinel.com/news/articles/6_million_could_be_cut_from_sc/
 
 
Today an editorial in the Sentinel issued a challenge to campaigns.  So, by all means, as campaigns heat up, let’s demand that candidates tell us what they think should be done with the rules. But let’s not forget that just a few years ago, many Coloradans were demanding stricter regulations because they had witnessed first-hand what could occur when there weren’t adequate protections.”

Fair enough. I haven’t read all of the existing rules, nor researched enough to give you my complete opinion yet. But I will tell you that my campaign will always be guided by a value proposition that says that we should leave the environment cleaner than when we found it; that we should think about how our decisions will protect the vulnerable; that the jobs programs we support should create sustainable jobs as opposed to those jobs that come during boom times and disappear during bust times; that our focus should always be on how we can educate our kids and prepare them to be critical thinkers because they are our future.

The local hype makes it sound like all drilling in Colorado stopped, yet in terms of actual rigs working; Colorado is second only to New Mexico. Maybe going slow is better than drilling every possible well site yesterday. Maybe if our boom and bust cycles were less dramatic we wouldn’t see house values decrease and rental vacancies and foreclosures increase every time the oil and gas industry decides it is not economically feasible to drill every possible site in our backyard.

I was an oil and gas lender in Denver during the last boom and bust cycle. Some of the current political leaders aren’t old enough to remember that this has been happening in Grand Junction since the boom and bust cycle of the uranium industry--maybe longer. We can do better. One way to do better is to create a sensible road map for the development of our natural resources that minimizes boom and bust cycles.