Claudette Konola
 
Sunday is Oscar night. It has been years since I’ve been interested in watching the Academy Awards, mostly because I’d usually rather curl up in a comfy chair, with a cup of green tea, and read a good trashy novel than watch a movie. It’s just not all that fun to go to a theater alone. The last movie I saw in a theater was Waiting for Superman, and that was because Club 20 organized a whole group of people to watch and discuss the movie. I never think to watch a movie on TV. My channel surfing is much more likely to end up at a cable news channel. I’ll admit it, I’m a political junkie.

But I’ll probably tune in to the Oscars on Sunday night. I am fascinated by the drama surrounding the nomination of Gasland. The documentary put the term fracking in the dictionary. Fracking has been the subject of many investigative journalists and a new EPA study since the movie’s debut. The environmentalists of the world see Gasland as ammunition in a fight against pollution of air and water by oil and gas exploration and production. The industry sees it as a pack of lies.

In fact the industry is so upset about Gasland’s nomination, that they lodged a PR campaign against the film. They sent a letter to the Academy suggesting that the film is ineligible for an Oscar. They created their own film about the industry. Problem is, the group complaining the loudest is a group that lobbies against any regulation of the oil and gas industry. If the industry doesn’t have to worry about pesky safeguards for the health of ordinary citizens they can make more money. It’s all about money.

PR campaigns aren’t about truth, PR campaigns are about protecting the industry with the checkbook. There are two simple formulas for any industry: short cut = profit; regulation = expense. PR campaigns are all about protecting the profits of the company and have nothing to do with protecting the rights or safety of the public. They are all about diverting attention from what is really happening, or shifting the blame to someone else. The fact that the industry is so hell bent on discrediting Gasland tells me that it is worried about its profits. I don’t know why, with the subsidies it gets from governments and the addiction we all have to guzzling its products, the industry is one of the most profitable in the world.

The EPA ordered a study of fracking. The study has been passed to a panel of scientists for peer review, which means that its release is imminent. The industry is embattled, and is going to fight anything that might change the way it does business. Personally, I’m more prone to believe a panel of scientists about fracking issues than to believe a PR firm charged with creating diversions. A diversion is just a sophisticated lie.

I hope Gasland wins its Oscar. Oscar winners usually draw audiences. Every American should see Gasland. After viewing the film, they should read the EPA report on fracking, and start thinking about the world they want to inhabit.

I’ll be watching for the results on Sunday night. I’ll be cheering for Gasland. I’ll be cheering for the health of our planet. And I’ll be watching to see who is wearing green ribbons on their designer gowns and tuxedos.

Homework

Academy Award Nomination for Gasland

Oscar Nominations and Voting

Oil and Gas Companies Petition Against Gasland Oscar

Energy Industry's Response to Gasland

Public Relations Campaigns

Top Five PR Campaigns of the Decade

 

GasLand

06/21/2010

0 Comments

 
HBO is premiering Gasland, a documentary film tonight. This film won a special jury prize at the Sundance Film Festival. It is a must see for anybody living in an area rich in natural gas resources. It is the story of the film maker’s curiosity about an offer he received to lease his land to a gas exploration company. In researching what might happen to his land, he discovered fracking. In a wonderful bit of irony, the film maker’s name is Fox. My instinct tells me that Fox News will not be giving good reviews to this film.

We’ve been writing a lot about fracking, and how the practice is a risk to air and water quality in the Colorado River Basin. We’ve been optimistically saying Regulate, Baby, Regulate as a response to Drill, Baby, Drill. The realist in me needs to recognize that regulations may not be the cure-all. What we need are ethical and transparent politicians and regulators who have not been bought by corporate interests.

What I haven’t been writing about is a phenomenon known as “regulatory capture.” Regulatory capture was written about half a century ago, but it seems we haven’t been watching for it. The idea is that regulatory agencies become so close to the industries they are charged with regulating that they forget which side they are on. Instead of protecting the interests of the nation and its citizens, they start protecting the interests of industry.

The sad thing is that regulatory capture extends beyond the agency responsible for regulating minerals extraction, including oil and gas, and coal. Regulatory capture has control of financial markets. Regulatory capture even has control of elections and the Unites States Supreme Court.

Regulatory capture is what the Tea Party should be talking about when they say, “Take Back Our Country.” It IS time to take back our country from the corporate interests that would pollute the world we live in just so that they can make a fast buck. Too bad the Tea Party is aligned with and funded by corporate interests.

Homework:

LA Times movie review of GasLand

Sheldon Whitehouse talking about corporate influence in government--especially regulatory agencies