Claudette Konola
 
At Tipton’s Townhall meeting, handouts were distributed that describe the work that Tipton has been doing in Washington. Tipton is the Chairman of a Subcommittee, which has allowed him to hold hearings with titles like Drilling for a Solution: Finding Ways to Curtail the Crushing Effect of High Gas Prices on Small Business and Regulatory Injury and How USDA’s Proposed GIPSA Rule Hurts America’s Small Businesses. Come September he’ll be hosting a hearing right here in Grand Junction: Are Excessive Energy Regulations and Policies Limiting Energy Independence, Killing Jobs and Increasing Prices for Consumers?

I know it is naïve to think that a hearing would be about discovering facts. It is hard to imagine how any new information will come out of hearings where the title directs participants to the desired answer and presenters are carefully chosen to present the desired point of view.  At the Townhall meeting, Tipton made a point of saying that not all regulations are bad, but his handouts tell a different story.

Tipton truly believes that regulation kills jobs, especially in the oil and gas industry. He even believes that the price of gas is tied to regulation, not market conditions. His main plan to create jobs is to do away with regulations. He’s proposed a bill that would require agencies to report to congress when any rule made by that agency becomes obsolete, or is in conflict with another regulation. I guess he doesn’t know that every regulation is subject to a public comment period, and that those comments are actually taken into consideration before the regulation is implemented. Certainly obsolete and conflicting regulations are discussed in public comment periods by industry spokesmen.

The one plan that sparked some interest for me, until I read it, was the Capital Access on Main Street Act, which Tipton is sponsoring with Ed  Perlmutter and Mike Coffman.  Tipton claims that it has bi-partisan support and will create jobs. The bill’s number is HR1356, and it has been introduced and moved to committee for review. It is hard for me to think of this bill as a jobs bill, since what it does is change how banks under $10,000,000,000 account for bad loans. In the current regulatory environment banks must write off a loan as soon as a loss is certain or when it becomes 90 days past due—which ever event comes first. This bill allows banks to take the loss over a seven year period. The impact would be to overstate the profits of banks by hiding losses in equity. In theory banks with higher equity levels will make more loans to small businesses, thus creating jobs.

The theory doesn’t hold much water and is reminiscent of how regulators approached the Savings and Loan Industry before that industry crashed. Regulators allowed S&Ls to put what I called “funny money” on their books by issuing certificates to S&Ls, which were actually loans from the regulator. The certificates could be counted as equity, and the S&L looked like it was well capitalized, when in fact it was bankrupt. I’m sure we all remember what happened then.

This bill ignores one other fact. Small Businesses say that they don’t need loans, they need people to buy their products and services.  It doesn’t really matter if money is available, even if it is “funny money,” if there is no reason to borrow because there are no sales.

Bottom line, HR1356 will not create any jobs, and it just might tank the banking industry again. Then again, it may never get out of committee. Tipton’s main solution for jobs is get rid of regulations and the tired old Drill Baby Drill, with “reasonable” regulations because everybody likes clean air and clean water.

Tipton intends to introduce legislation to authorize hydropower development on all BLM conduits, including canals. He plans to reduce regulations in order to make development of hydropower projects more economically feasible. Can’t wait to see that one.

Homework:

HR1356 Capital Access on Main Street

WSJ Article Small Firms Hunger for Sales not Credit

Book for Sale that Discusses the Economics of Hydropower
 
 
Candidates are required to report the amount of money they raise in any quarter. Poor Scott Tipton, the newcomer is seriously nipping at his heels. During the last quarter Tipton raised $146,000. Sal Pace, his Democratic rival, raised $102,000.  On the surface it looks like Tipton won that race.

But look again. Tipton took three months to raise his money, while Pace only had one month to raise his money.  Put another way, Tipton raised $49,000 each month, while Pace raised $100,000 each month. Pace is setting the pace.

Tipton is a millionaire. Pace is not. Tipton can seed his own campaign if he needs to. The national Republican Party will support Tipton. The national Democratic Party will support Pace. Money will come from 527 organizations for both candidates. There is going to be a lot of money in this race because we live in a swing district.

A bit of a surprise for me: Pace has already received $15,000 from unions. They don’t usually enter a race so early on. Tipton must have really pissed off union workers. Pace, being from Colorado’s only real steel town, would naturally have some union contacts, and has apparently already tapped into that resource. More than money, unions can get out the vote with boots on the ground during the get out the vote phase of an election.

Go Pace! 

Homework

Tipton's Hometown Newspaper Story About Tipton's Fundraising

 
 
For the life of me I can’t figure out why Americans keep electing people who don’t like government to run government. Because the budget for the fiscal year that started six and a half months ago still hasn’t been passed, our government was again on the verge of a shutdown. We are over half way through the budget year and we still don’t know what we are going to spend. We are over half way to a new budget year and we still haven’t started talking about what the next budget should look like.  Another continuing resolution (CR) was passed, with 54 Republicans voting against the Republican bill.

The GOP is in complete disarray. Boehner actually needed to attract Democratic votes in order to get the CR passed so that government could continue running. He can’t keep his own caucus together. Republicans make fun of Nancy Pelosi, but she managed to lead her caucus and get things done. Boehner is proving to be a very ineffective leader.

It’s probably not totally his fault. American voters sent a bunch of people to Washington who think they would like living in a world with no government. Sensing the mood of party activists back home, they are unwilling to enter into the compromises necessary to actually pass bills. Some are planning on a run for a different office in 2012, and know that the people who show up at caucuses will not stand for anyone who doesn’t walk the untra-conservative walk. The only fly in the ointment is that the people who show up at caucuses do control who gets to represent the party on the ballot, but they don’t represent the typical, much more moderate, voter. Catch 22! Follow the leader and end a political career, or hang with the extremists, crash the government, get on the ballot, lose the election. Same result either way.

Just in case you didn’t already know, Representative Tipton of the 3rd Congressional district is one of the freshmen legislators that Boehner doesn’t know what to do with. He did not support his leadership, presumably because he thinks that he needs to cling to the far right in order to be re-elected in 2012. I don’t yet know who will be running against him, but Tipton can’t get reelected without moderate Republicans, Independents, and a few Democrats. Right now I’d vote for a duck before I’d vote for Tipton. Quack.

ColoradoPols already has the odds of Tipton winning reelection at 5 to 1 (generally incumbents are given 2 to 1 odds), with two Democrats possibly running against him—Sal Pace, the current minority leader in the house, and Bill Thiebaut, Pueblo’s D.A.

Homework

No Good Moves for Boehner

People Considering Different Office Buck Party on Vote

Some in GOP Tired of Right Wing

The Lay of the Land

Tipton Voted No

ColoradoPols

Sal Pace

Bill Thiebaut
 
 
Republicans have been attacking the Environmental Protection Agency for years. Scott Tipton, Representative from Colorado’s Congressional District 3, has vowed to defund and dismantle the agency. This is not a new story.

One of the greatest environmental controversies coming out of the Bush Administration was its directive to close the EPA libraries. In fact, they closed the doors on some of the branches and started packing up books ostensibly to send them to an office where the collection would be digitized. When researchers and congress pushed back, the EPA was directed to come up with a reorganization plan, but funding was cut to the agency. The plan was due to be completed in Fiscal 2011.

Many people felt the Bush Administration wanted the EPA gone so that the oil and gas industry could thrive in an environment with no regulation. The EPA is at cross purposes with industry’s desire to maximize profits. There is no doubt that regulations increase company expenses. But regulations also fulfill the mission of the EPA as described at their website:

“The mission of EPA is to protect human health and the environment.

EPA's purpose is to ensure that:

  • all Americans are protected from significant risks to human health and the environment where they live, learn and work;
  • national efforts to reduce environmental risk are based on the best available scientific information;
  • federal laws protecting human health and the environment are enforced fairly and effectively;
  • environmental protection is an integral consideration in U.S. policies concerning natural resources, human health, economic growth, energy, transportation, agriculture, industry, and international trade, and these factors are similarly considered in establishing environmental policy;
  • all parts of society -- communities, individuals, businesses, and state, local and tribal governments -- have access to accurate information sufficient to effectively participate in managing human health and environmental risks;
  • environmental protection contributes to making our communities and ecosystems diverse, sustainable and economically productive; and
  • the United States plays a leadership role in working with other nations to protect the global environment.”
Homework

2006 Attempts to Dismantle EPA Library

2007 Article About Closing the EPA Libraries

2007 Report to Congress About EPA Libraries

2008 Article About Closing the EPA Libraries

2010 Article About Reorganizing the EPA Libraries

Laws Establishing the Authority of the EPA